Thu 29th Jun 2006 @ 01:23 2006: Javis on The Internet
I gave up and visited the URL that AOL keep pushing on their TV adverts - www.aol.co.uk/discuss. It turns out that they commissioned Jarvis Cocker to write a monologue describing his duality about the internet and music delivery. He ends with
"I hope you've enjoyed this little excerpt from the on-going domestic drama inside my head. Cyber-Jarv seemed to win this round, but then Music is only one tiny aspect of this thing we call "The Internet" - there's so much more to discuss. But I think even those two guys would have to agree on one thing; no matter what your opinion on it is - The Net is Here to Stay."
After the article was posted in April, they've garnered 4 pages of comments, that's about 40 comments at a rough guess; that's not too promising for AOL. The content itself ended up being pro-internet - that's probably not too surprising, given that it's hosted by AOL. I'll have to see what their other topics are, but I suspect that somone like AOL will tend to go with the flow, and make sure that the editorial and the comments support that... or am I being too cynical?!
Thu 29th Jun 2006 @ 00:37 2006: Marc Andreessen: Going against the Grain
Sun have an interview with Marc Andreessen, about his new venture, in which he explains why he chose Sun's AMD-based servers running Solaris 10.
He reckons that "Power usage, rack space, and software support account for a much bigger slice of the pie" than the hardware purchase cost.
It boils down to the following (not entirely complete, as a comparison tool) data, for running a server for 3 years:
| White Box Intel / Linux | $10,350 |
| White Box AMD / Linux | $9,180 |
| White Box AMD / Solaris | $5,700 |
| Sun AMD / Solaris | $4,700 |
Tue 27th Jun 2006 @ 01:48 2006: Selling out To Da Man
In-Text adverts ... Yes, it's bad. You can vote on it at the shell tutorial
I really don't know about this - they sent me a personalised spam a while ago, and I ended up signing up to try it out.
I don't mind the Google ads, they're not on every page, and they are really quite subtle.
These new in-text adverts are on the shell tutorial pages - the stuff under /sh/sh.shtml for a trial week or so, since that's where most visitors go. I've sorted out the "don't put it in this part of the page" code, so it should only be in the body content.
It comes up with a few relevant-seeming links, and some irrelevant ones, but that's probably not too different from Google.
The real niggle with this is how irritating it could be. I just don't know. I'm not a usability guru, and I don't know how smart their database and code is. If it gets me buckets of cash without annoying users, then that would, of course, be a Good Thing. If it irritates the feck out of everybody then it's totally pointless.
I activated it on Sunday night; now, on Monday night, I've added a "Vote" feature. In the intervening day (I've no idea how long changes take to propagate through the system) I've apparently had 1971 visits; Google reckon 2997; I reckon more like 3500 real-people visitors per day (logfiles seem to be running behind schedule these days ... Kontera and Google use JavaScript, so robots are unlikely to hit their counters).
Sun 25th Jun 2006 @ 00:11 2006: Apologies
My apologies if you have tried to comment on the previous two items; I've got a dev box and the live system, which are both LAMP, but otherwise have very little in common. I added a new field to the dev system, but failed to update the live database, which meant that new comments on the live system failed.
Silly boy. Go stand in the corner.
Sat 24th Jun 2006 @ 00:08 2006: MySpace
I have no idea what all this MySpace stuff is about - it seems to be a GeoCities for the current decade, with some crap templates thrown in, so far as I can tell.
It's all rather Web 1.4 (nothing ever really gets beyond about 1.4 without becoming something else; I reckon that 1.4 is to software what "e" is to maths, statistics and all that.... 2.712 or something)
So, http://www.myspace.com/unixshell is, erm well, a URL to a rather blank page with very little information (other than my starsign, which it appears I cannot disable).
There is also a blog, hopefully more likely than my own, to produce valid RSS feeds, at http://blog.myspace.com/blog/rss.cfm?friendID=77462666 - I think that's it, anyway. Maybe that's just the maiden post. Who knows? Not such an old fart as I, anyway.
Myself, I thought that this was my space; maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I can reach a wider audience via MySpace. I have no idea.
Still, using something akin to a blog to announce another blog makes me feel really web 1.3 at least, maybe even 1.4 on a good day.
Will it change the world? Probably not. But hey, it's a bandwagon.
Still at least I know why, with only a little hype, the myspace website keeps falling over with random error messages - it's written in .NET. And as for virtual networking, etc, you have to be in LA. Nice.
Wed 21st Jun 2006 @ 13:43 2006: Letter to the American people from her Majesty's Home Office
Tue 20th Jun 2006 @ 00:24 2006: Anonymous
A corporate email I saw recently... this is an interesting interpretation of the word "anonymous":
Participation in the survey is voluntary and all responses remain completely anonymous.
To participate:
Confirm your id and password
Employees that do not have access to the intranet should contact their leader (or a colleague) to obtain an MS Word version of the online survey from the Intranet.
Sun 18th Jun 2006 @ 22:23 2006: Future versions of PHP5?
I've been having a bit of grief with RSS recently, in terms of HTML, XML markup, Microsoft's "interesting" view of standards, etc.
It seems that PHP are working on it: for now, I think that the answer is to roll my own version of htmlentities
Sun 18th Jun 2006 @ 21:17 2006: eh
Eh?
This is a new line
This is italics
It looks as if the get-rid-of-ms-crap also takes the deHTMLifying out :-(
Sun 18th Jun 2006 @ 21:15 2006: Yet more RSS woes
RSS still being a pain; you'd have thought stuff like this should be dead simple... maybe that's why people use things like blogger!
Sun 18th Jun 2006 @ 01:37 2006: Nero
I have never made any claims to being up-to-date with Wintel software, but when I accidentally downloaded a Ubuntu ISO to my Wintel laptop tonight, I thought that I would save the time of copying it over wifi to a Linux server, by just burning the CD from the Wintel laptop.
It turns out that the Wintel laptop doesn't come with CD-burning capability (is that not built-in? really?!) so I went for what I have heard most Wintel users talking about - Nero. I like the name, anyway; there's a certain amount of wit in there. I want to burn a 698Mb CD, and the download to allow WinXP to burn CDs is an extra 123Mb download!
Is it me, or is 123Mb (without helpfiles) rather a large amount for a glorified "dd"? If the software download itself ever ends, then I'll let you know if it seems any good or not. As it is, I can't believe that I've already got a fully-featured OS but still need to download 123Mb to create CDs. What crud could they possibly write to use up over 100Mb of code?!
Fri 16th Jun 2006 @ 17:40 2006: Keep off the Ice


There's a tree next to a pond near to where I work, and it's got a sign on the trunk, warning people not to walk on the ice in winter.
I'd love to think that this was by design - if it is, kudos to whomever thought of it - but in summer, when the warning is irrelevant, it is covered up by the leaves; as it gets colder, the leaves fall off, revealing the sign!
I like that, that's elegant!
Thu 15th Jun 2006 @ 21:53 2006: Sniff Petrol

SniffPetrol is a new(ish) quite refreshing petrolhead website - and they also have this piece of pure class
Thu 15th Jun 2006 @ 20:54 2006: Broken Windows Theory
This blog post disappeared from MSDN, then reappeared with the message:
[This was originally posted a week ago, and yanked of my own volition. What followed was a firestorm of speculation about how The Man beat me down, etc, which is completely untrue. Now I repost this back, only to quell the speculation. Blog on.]
[I have removed the rest of this post of my own volition, without any external pressure whatsoever. What started as an opinion on the challenges of managing large software projects has turned out to be a rallying point for detractors, which isn't interesting or productive. - Ed.]
Thu 15th Jun 2006 @ 11:45 2006: ah have broken the rss
I've broken the RSS somehow - I think it's something to do with trying to be clever with the quotes :-(
Thu 15th Jun 2006 @ 01:10 2006: Happy Birthday, OpenSolaris
People seem to be celebrating OpenSolaris's first birthday... Here's a fun thread from when the project was a few weeks old, if you enjoy religious debates about OS choices and decisions: I am wondering if anyone would be interested in discussing Solaris_86 (10 and later) vis-a-vis Linux?, featuring a few big names* and some really bad arguments.
Schilly gets into some really silly side-debates (the star one is quite fun), Solaris and Linux fanboys rant ahoy, and Eric B takes the role of mediator...
Schilly is now the proud father of Schillix of course, as well as being author of cdrecord, star and other good and useful software incorporating 'interesting' design decisions
* depending on your definition of "big" and "name" - Casper Dik, Jörg Schilling, Eric Boutilier, etc
Tue 13th Jun 2006 @ 00:24 2006: Vista: It could kill the interweb (or maybe not)
The FT were reporting that the Windows Vista Beta download could kill the internet or something so silly:
“It’s not that we didn’t anticipate this level of interest or demand, but that we are at the threshold of what the internet can bear,”
"We are literally saying that if we increased our bandwidth any further there’s a possibility of taking down the internet – people might have problems with World Cup viewing, etc.”
Mon 12th Jun 2006 @ 23:08 2006: Welcome to the 1990s
You can add markup to the comments now. Wow, this is so 1990s.
Mon 12th Jun 2006 @ 00:01 2006: Bugatti Veyron
Just stumbled across this (Jeremy Clarkson) review of the Bugatti Veyron - that's the silly 1001bhp VW he reviewed last year. It can do 252mph, which he puts into perspective in this way:
At 200mph you can feel the front of the car getting light as it starts to lift. As a result you start to lose your steering, so you aren’t even able to steer round whatever it is you can’t see because of the vibrations. Make no mistake, 200mph is at the limit of what man can do right now. Which is why the new Bugatti Veyron is worthy of some industrial strength genuflection. Because it can do 252mph. And that’s just mad — 252mph means that in straight and level flight this car is as near as makes no difference as fast as a Hawker Hurricane.
mating two Audi V8s to create an 8 litre W16. Which was then garnished with four turbochargers.
"God, it was hard,” said one of the engineers I know vaguely. “The gearbox in an F1 car only has to last a few hours. Volkswagen wanted the Veyron’s to last 10 or 20 years. And remember, the Bugatti is a damn sight more powerful than any F1 car.”
A VW Polo will generate 0.6g if you stamp on the middle pedal hard. You get that from the air brake alone on a Veyron. Factor in the carbon ceramic discs and you will pull up from 250mph in just 10sec. Sounds good, but in those 10sec you’ll have covered a third of a mile.
That’s five football pitches to stop.
Sun 11th Jun 2006 @ 02:49 2006: US-III
KernelTrap have a discussion about OpenBSD support of the US-III, when the US-IV has been out for a long time, and the US-IV+ is old news, really.
I had thought that support for the US-III was ancient history, and whilst I admit that I had not followed the story, I had assumed that support for the US-IV and US-IV+ was going the same way.
The media seem to have a rather simplistic view : "SPARC == RISC == SUN" which is not the case, but surely Sun can release the specs of the UltraSPARC III, USIV and even the USIV+ so that it can be supported on other OSes?
I have always been a fan of Sun, and particularly of the quality of the hardware, and the operating system also. Providing the specs of the CPU woulnd't be a huge loss to Linux, because the Solaris OS is so scalable, to an extent which (with the best will in the world) Linux can't yet compete with; it wouldn't provide hardware rivals with any particular benefit either, because IBM and HP have their own focus, and it's a long way away from SPARC, in reality.
Sun 11th Jun 2006 @ 01:43 2006: Bizarre Troll Site
http://trollaxor.com/text/i_am_forking_the_linux_kernel.html
There are other random trolls there, too, but that just seemed like the most bizarre of the lot. Thanks, slashdot!
Update May 2010: Link has moved here: http://www.trollaxor.com/2006/04/i-am-forking-linux-kernel.html
Thanks for the update, Grant.
Sun 11th Jun 2006 @ 01:18 2006: Home Taping Isn't Killing Music
The BBC are reporting that we can make copies of music for personal use, after all ... presumably, that makes it okay to use services such as allofmp3.com for obtaining such copies, also?
The wording might be a bit inaccurate, though - does this apply to UK consumers, or to consumers of UK-signed artistes?
Sun 11th Jun 2006 @ 00:53 2006: F1 Progress Monitor
ITV have a Form Card for all the drivers in F1.
In other news, the German Cheat qualified third at Silverstone today. Go Alsono and Kimi !
Sun 11th Jun 2006 @ 00:02 2006: RSS
Thanks for the hints Andy, cleaner looking RSS for web browsers now. I also noticed that the Live Bookmark thing wasn't working in FireFox, so that has been fixed too (a LINK tag in the HEAD section missing since the move to the new URL (urandom from random) - d'oh!)
So, we should be fully RSS'd up again now
Thu 8th Jun 2006 @ 16:31 2006: Unhappy sysadm kicks off mass "rm -rf /"
Prosecution Witness Describes Chaos In UBS PaineWebber Attack: 63yr-old Roger Duronio expected a bonus of $50k but only got $32k (a much nicer number), so he set a "logic bomb" (I think that's mediaspeak for "cron job") to trash the files across the datacentre and remote sites.
Apparently his script was called "MRM -r" - maybe that stands for "mass rm -r"
The worrying part is at the end of the article: "Many of the servers were down that whole day and part of the next. Some servers in remote locations were down for weeks." - are UBS admitting that they don't back up some of their remote servers?
Mon 5th Jun 2006 @ 00:51 2006: Renault F1
Earlier today (Sun 4th June) I was on the southern part of the M25 motorway, and drove past a Renault F1 lorry... last weekend was Monaco (great win, Fernando), but next weekend is Silverstone. If the car has only got to London by now, then they are pretty well behind schedule for getting to Silverstone by Saturday ;-)
Seriously, though, what reason would a Renault F1 truck have for being in Kent this weekend? They can't be testing somewhere as crazy as Brands Hatch, surely?
Still, it was nice to see the chaps on the road - I was somewhat tempted to slow down to give the lads a cheer, but I wasn't sure that they would appreciate a few flashes and beeps from some geezer in a Ford.
Still looking forward to Silverstone this coming weekend - it seems as if tickets are still available (apparently there's some football thingy going on around the same time) - it would be great to get some cheap tickets, a weekend-long babysitter, free hotel, etcetc, but I guess I'll have to settle for the visit we made to Silverstone a few years ago, when our presence helped Mika beat Schumacher for the British Grand Prix win.
Mon 5th Jun 2006 @ 00:14 2006: Spam - not from me
I have had a number of email bounces, which indicate that somebody is forging the steve-parker.org domain to send spam (eg, from jose at steve-parker.org, which is not a valid email address). These all target a certain large company (with whom I have no connection) and look like test attempts prior to a further attack.
This domain (steve-parker.org) does not send unsolicited emails of any kind; to receive an email from an @steve-parker.org address, you must subscribe to the WishList and/or uRandom account (http://steve-parker.org/wishlist/account.php), or have already sent me an email - either directly, or via http://steve-parker.org/mail/
I am not in the habit of sending attachments (of any kind), so - as always - if you receive an unexpected email, it is safer to delete it than to read it.
If you are using a particularly common combination of Operating System (eg, MS Windows, Mac OS) and/or a particularly vulnerable email client / web browser (eg Outlook, Outlook Express, Internet Explorer) then this advice should be taken even more strongly.
So - what software should I use? There is no "right answer", but the "wrong answer" is probably any combination of MS Windows and MS Outlook (or Outlook Express) and Internet Explorer.
Steve.