| 2004 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
| 2006 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Oct | Oct | |
| 2007 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2007 |
| 2008 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2008 |
| 2009 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2009 |
| 2010 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2010 |
| 2011 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2011 |
| 2012 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2012 |
| 2013 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | 2013 |
Sat 30th Sep 2006 @ 00:48 2006: Bread is Dangerous
http://www.eskimo.com/~spban/bread.html though I bet it's been elsewhere also:
!!! BREAD IS DANGEROUS !!!
Research on bread indicates that:
1. More than 98 percent of convicted felons are bread users.
2. Fully HALF of all children who grow up in bread-consuming households score below average on standardized tests.
3. In the 18th century, when virtually all bread was baked in the home, the average life expectancy was less than 50 years; infant mortality rates were unacceptably high; many women died in childbirth; and diseases such as typhoid, yellow fever, and influenza ravaged whole nations.
4. More than 90 percent of violent crimes are committed within 24 hours of eating bread.
5. Bread is made from a substance called "dough." It has been proven that as little as one pound of dough can be used to suffocate a mouse. The average American eats more bread than that in one month!
6. Primitive tribal societies that have no bread exhibit a low incidence of cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, and osteoporosis.
7. Bread has been proven to be addictive. Subjects deprived of bread and given only water to eat begged for bread after as little as two days.
8. Bread is often a "gateway" food item, leading the user to "harder" items such as butter, jelly, peanut butter, and even cold cuts.
9. Bread has been proven to absorb water. Since the human body is more than 90 percent water, it follows that eating bread could lead to your body being taken over by this absorptive food product, turning you into a soggy, gooey bread-pudding person.
10. Newborn babies can choke on bread.
11. Bread is baked at temperatures as high as 400 degrees Fahrenheit! That kind of heat can kill an adult in less than one minute.
12. Most American bread eaters are utterly unable to distinguish between significant scientific fact and meaningless statistical babbling.
In light of these frightening statistics, it has been proposed that the following bread restrictions be made:
1. No sale of bread to minors.
2. A nationwide "Just Say No To Toast" campaign, complete celebrity TV spots and bumper stickers.
3. A 300 percent federal tax on all bread to pay for all the societal ills we might associate with bread.
4. No animal or human images, nor any primary colors (which may appeal to children) may be used to promote bread usage.
5. The establishment of "Bread-free" zones around schools.
Fri 29th Sep 2006 @ 14:44 2006: no2id
No2ID, the campaigners against ID cards, had a full-page newspaper advert with this image. Subtle, isn't it? ;-)
Shame the page is now royally messed up; still, it'll be a brand new page next month ;-)
Full-sized image here: http://www.no2id.net/resources/images/BlairBarcode.jpg
Fri 29th Sep 2006 @ 09:37 2006: Richard Hammond

A little comic strip about Top Gear presenter Richard Hammond. Sorry for breaking up the page.
Tue 26th Sep 2006 @ 09:34 2006: .mobi
I hadn't head of the new .mobi Top-Level Domain (TLD), but registration opens today. More info at dotmobi.org and dotmobi.typepad.com, but the key thing is that sites under the .mobi TLD have to comply with .mobi's standards. From the FAQ:
Q: Do I have to have a web site associated with my .mobi registration to be compliant?
A: No, but once you have a site, it must be compliant. If you wish to put up content at once, dotMobi has a "parked page" template as well as a template for a simple web site that you can use. You can access these tools in our Development Forum.
And from the standards doc (Section 2.2):
mTLD will audit all dotmobi domains for compliance to the mandatory rules. mTLD will audit these domains in whatever way or frequency decided by mTLD to be practical and reasonable. When a web site using a dotmobi name is not compliant with the mandatory rules, an exception report for the dotmobi name will be created by mTLD.
Dotmobi names not in compliance with mandatory rules will have 60 days to become compliant. mTLD shall send two notices to the registrant's registrar asking the registrar to contact the offending registrant with the exception report. The registrar will be required to provide a 60 day, then a 30 day notice of this non-compliance. If a name is not in compliance with 15 days left to go, then mTLD may chose to contact the registrant directly after making best efforts to make contact through their registrar.
Dotmobi names that are not brought back into compliance shall be removed from the zone file for resolution on the internet. The dotmobi names shall not be deleted from the registration system, but their name will be placed on hold until they are in compliance with the mandatory rules.
So .... I can have a .mobi domain ("m" and "o" are on the same key, so .mobi has the same problem as .com on a phone keypad) but only if what I put there complies with the phone manufacturers' standards (.mobi is run by 3, Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung, etc - see www.dotmobi.org for the list). That's like saying that you can have a .com domain, but only if your website works on a Microsoft PC. Okay, it might not be much use if it doesn't, and while the vast majority of websites don't validate (this site included), it would be nice if they did. Enforced compliance in exchange for the right to own a .mobi domain, when I can have a .com domain for a couple of dollars? I don't see the incentive, for anyone other than the mobile phone manufacturers and networks, who seem to think that people will produce crippled content to work with their phones, simply because there's a .mobi domain in it (for around $30, at that!). To the manufacturers and networks, there are around 2bn mobile phones around the world; if only there was content for them all...
I wouldn't normally wish ill for a TLD of all things, but this seems to be a big backwards step - there is no opportunity for the kind of innovations we are used to on the web, which have brought good and bad things (from ActiveX to AJAX), but most of all, has brought progress, and the successful ideas survive.
Mon 25th Sep 2006 @ 22:57 2006: Coordination
Seriously... try this. I'm right-handed and right-footed; it may be necessary to swap things over if you are left-somethinged:
Whilst sitting down, lift your right foot off the floor and make clockwise circles.
Now, while doing this, draw the digit "6" in the air with your right hand.
Your foot will change direction, and there is nothing you can do about it.
Sat 23rd Sep 2006 @ 00:33 2006: Everyclick
EveryClick is an ask.com-powered search engine which gives 50% of its revenue to charity. A good thing, surely? If you use the above URL, advertised links will generate revenue for ME Research UK.
This may be a better thing than using Google for your regular search; you can benefit your preferred charity instead of just filling Google's coffers when you do click on an advert. However, with this deal (or with ask.com), it is not clear to me which links are paid-for, and which are genuine results.
One thing I can confirm, is that asking both sites for "bourne shell" provides first-page results which I know are all kosher. I certainly know that the #1 result has not paid for the listing, because it is my own site, in that instance.
So, I thought I'd go for an obvious guess... "sexy girls" gives two marked adverts at everyclick.com, but results in "This query does not comply with Ask.com Terms of Service" at ask.com - very high-brow of ask.com, to be applauded, of course. but I'm not sure what everyclick are really offering. Yes, some money to charity; the lottery do the same, but so what?
If I can only generate charity money by clicking on "sexy girls" adverts, do I really want to do that anyway? Is that really something that I would reccommend that my friends and family do, in the noble cause of raising money for ME research? I am not convinced.
Some serious, not just late-friday-night research is justified here.
Fri 22nd Sep 2006 @ 21:52 2006: Misuse of ATMs
Apparently somebody reprogramed an ATM to give out $20 notes instead of $5 notes, using information available for purchase from the manufacturer. Schneier updated the blog with the URL but that has now been replaced by a redirect. Google don't cache the document (it's a PDF, anyway), but ... er, don't Google have a "View as HTML" option? Oh yes, they do.. I can't actually see any passwords listed there though; it seems that Google only convert a certain amount of the PDF (and, let's face it, not very well, at that).
Wired report that users of these ATMs will be informed on Monday. The Wired blog lists previous articles on the subject here, here, here and here.
Great quote from Wired:
I asked him why they'd allow the denominations to be reprogrammed entirely from the keypad. Why not require the ATM be physically unlocked and opened, and the operator flip a switch before getting root? "Your suggestion is well taken and it is one of the possibilities that we are thinking," he says.
Well, duh.
Fri 22nd Sep 2006 @ 21:37 2006: NPfIT
Ross Anderson, Cambridge security bod, has an article entitled
Which Services should remain Offline? discussing the proposal to make patient records available online, and the difficulties that that entails. He also notes that if you opt out of any of the wonderful new features to come, then you won't have any of them.
Fri 22nd Sep 2006 @ 15:20 2006: Managing the Life of an Individual
"It's not big brother, it's managing the life of an individual" is how West Midlands Police support manager Fred Tracey describes their new security system of using fingerprints to control access to buildings and computer systems, according to The Register.
Well, at least they're being honest about it, I suppose :-(
Wed 20th Sep 2006 @ 23:14 2006: Never mind the gullible
http://www.bash.org/?244321
Cthon98: hey, if you type in your pw, it will show as stars
Cthon98: ********* see!
AzureDiamond: hunter2
AzureDiamond: doesnt look like stars to me
Cthon98:
Cthon98: thats what I see
AzureDiamond: oh, really?
Cthon98: Absolutely
AzureDiamond: you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2
AzureDiamond: haha, does that look funny to you?
Cthon98: lol, yes. See, when YOU type hunter2, it shows to us as *******
AzureDiamond: thats neat, I didnt know IRC did that
Cthon98: yep, no matter how many times you type hunter2, it will show to us as *******
AzureDiamond: awesome!
AzureDiamond: wait, how do you know my pw?
Cthon98: er, I just copy pasted YOUR ******'s and it appears to YOU as hunter2 cause its your pw
AzureDiamond: oh, ok.
Some people can't be helped.
Tue 19th Sep 2006 @ 22:52 2006: LinuxFromScratch
Just a note for users of UK keyboards installing LinuxFromScratch, something I did not find to be obvious:
echo 'KEYMAP="uk"' > /etc/sysconfig/console
This fixes the keymap for the console (though not X, ssh sessions, etc, as they have their own configs, for perfectly good reasons).
Mon 18th Sep 2006 @ 23:49 2006: HP
As Schneier says, 'this is the sort of thing that would get a "hacker" immediately arrested. But if the chairman of the HP board does it, suddenly it's a gray area.'
Sat 16th Sep 2006 @ 00:31 2006: It's not F1, it's not ID, so it must be Security... RIP
Scrambling for Safety #8 (they convened with the Home Office in August... here is their agenda, annotated with the slides (PDF). Brian Gladman's slides make the obvious statements that GOV.UK security has always been based on security through obscurity, and closed-source models, and why this is a silly idea.
I've not read the rest properly yet, but BBC summed it up as "Police decryption powers 'flawed'".
When I was a sysadmin, I found the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIP) unbearable (I could have sworn that I blogged that, but I can't find it); now I'm not, it's even worse ;-0
RIP has been well documented, though poorly publicised. GOV.UK basically told me, as an email administrator, that if they wanted to see any email that passed through our system (same goes for any other UK server), that if they asked me for somebody's mail traffic, that:
(a) I must provide it
(b) I was not allowed to informed the "victim"; otherwise I would be in breach of the RIP Act.
So - even if they told me that they wanted my MD's emails, I would be legally obliged to provide it, and legally obliged, if he asked, to lie.
Unfortunately, as I'm no longer the admin for any of my email accounts, I'm on the other side or the RIPA coin... if my emails are requested, it would be illegal for the informant to inform me that it had happened (maybe it already has happened - I would only know if an admin had taken the risk of illegally informing me).
Anybody heard of a certain G. Orwell, who wrote a book in 1948 about the year 1983... or was it 1985? Sometime around then, anyway. I've got a feeling a book was written; you never know, it may be relevant.
Fortunately, I was never put in such a situation (I think that I'm allowed to admit that much!) It seems that they are still beating out the details, six years later. It gives me some hope that they have got the Cambridge guys onboard; http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/ - they often come up with sensible answers to silly questions.
Thu 14th Sep 2006 @ 13:04 2006: Fingerprinting children ... again
The Register are reporting that the National Union of Teachers (NUT) have come out against fingerprinting schoolchildren without parental consent.
See also http://steve-parker.org/urandom/?y=2006&m=09#ltka
Thu 14th Sep 2006 @ 12:08 2006: The Daily Show: The misappropriation of 9/11
US comedy show The Daily Show had a section on the 12th Sep called The misappropriation of 9/11. It's on YouTube, and quite droll. Other cuts from the show are also on YouTube.
Tue 12th Sep 2006 @ 23:27 2006: 911 And All That
I've just watched the Loose Change 911 video, and the 9/11 In Plane Site video (both on video.google.com).
One of the many recurring themes through such commentaries, is how conveniently the buildings fell (Towers 1 and 2, plus Building 7, later in the day).
I'm not ready to declare a position on this, but one thing which does occur to me, particularly from the coverage of the latter documentary, is the possibility that such high-profile targets in such expensive parts of the world... would they have explosives pre-installed in case of structural problems, in order to effect a controlled demolition?
I can see that this would be a difficult and embarrassing position for the US Gov to admit to having made (hence no such explanation), whilst being an "innocent" explanation for the controlled demolition of the three lost buildings without significant damage to surrounding properties. I can see the logic behind such a decision, at least, although it does of course leave the possibility of a far simpler terrorist attack detonating those explosives, without the hassle of taking over planes, etc.
Just a thought...
Tue 12th Sep 2006 @ 00:15 2006: Alonso and Massa
YouTube has got a purpose, after all... This is footage from Massa's Ferrari which shows that Alonso (the car which you can occasionally see in the distance) did not hinder Massa's qualifying lap.
Alonso was on his out-lap (that is, the lap wasn't timed, he was just out on the track to get a flying lap having started a hot lap passing the start line at speed), Massa was on his hot (timed) lap. So, if Alonso was in the way of Massa, he should have gone off the racing line to allow Massa to pass him, as if Alonso (the blue/yellow car ... it's blue and yellow, honest; you can't tell from this video!) wasn't there at all.
However, because of this alleged blocking, Alonso was put back 5 places on the grid, from 5th to 10th and although he worked his way up to 3rd position with 9 laps to go, he could potentially have won the 53-lap race. As it was, his engine exploded, but it is possible that it wouldn't have done if hadn't been penalised by 5 critical places on the grid.
Watch the video, see if you believe that Massa (the red Ferrari) was held up at any point by Alonso (the blue Renault in the distance). See if you can even tell that it is a blue Renault; I can't tell.
The result of this was that Ferrari have gained the lead in the Constructors championship (as Alonso's engine blew up; had he started from 5th, he'd have had a much easier race, pushing the engine less, and maintaining Renault's position), and that Alonso's 12 point lead in the Driver's championship was reduced from 12 points to 2 points.
If either championship is affected by this, then Max Moseley and Bernie Ecclestone have a lot to answer for.
This travesty has tarnished Schumacher's announcement of his retirement from F1.
Nah. Massa was flat-out there, for the whole lap. He was not obstructed by Alonso.
Mon 11th Sep 2006 @ 01:01 2006: M*A*S*H
Saw an episode of M*A*S*H tonight, with the civility shown; the (effectively neutral) medics operating on an enemy soldier.
It didn't seem unreal a mere 5 years ago. Somehow, since the events of 11th Sep 2001, the idea of USAians in a combat environment, but having a clearly-defined enemy, for a clearly-defined purpose, along with treating that enemy in a humane manner, now seems unrealistic.
The hundreds of years of international law, upon which all our shared history is based, seems to have disappeared since 9/11.
I had no intention of making a political statement here; the timing is purely coincidental. Seeing that episode of M*A*S*H has just brought home to me how ethical (and proud of it) the USAians can be. The difference is not any terrorist attacks in the past decades, rather than a change of attitude from the USA.
Our UK complicity in this new attitude has not helped the UK, either.
I'm really not wanting to get too political, honest ... I'm no politician, I'm just a geek on the ground. I'm simply reporting what I see, and it does appear to be topical.
Sun 10th Sep 2006 @ 01:19 2006: Ed and Karen

Congratulations, Ed and Karen, who got married today (photo with Ed's parents, Valerie and Michael). I went to school and Uni with Ed (who was called Eddie at the time).
Ed was my "best friend" at school; we went through a lot of stuff together (and have a lot of mutually-assured-destruction style blackmail information about each other!). He's a good man. He'll scavenge a beer off you every time, he's guaranteed not to turn up when he said he would, and all the rest, but he does have his flaws, also. Nah, Ed's a good lad, really. I reckon I could probably vouch for him, at a push ;-) As I said, he's got a lot of dirt on me, too, so yes, Ed is definitely a great guy.
At Uni, Ed helped the formation of a number of bands, including Slide Pheromone, with whom he was the drummer. SP later (without Ed on drums) became Moeker, who are still going in London.
Ed and myself (with Jim and various other friends) were in numerous bands in our late teens/early 20s, (none of which were anywhere near good enough to warrant any mention whatsoever on the superinterhighweb, of course). One of our bands was described by a neighbour as "like a chinese water torture" - praise indeed!
Ben made an excellent Best Man speech, and the whole day went very well. It was also great, for me, to meet up with some of the old peeps from Uni, as well as the DogWorld (Britain's best-selling canine newspaper) guys and the others we met on the stag night.
So - Ed: Didn't get a degree, didn't become a rock star, but did somehow convince Karen to marry him.
Congratulations to Ed and Karen, and my best wishes for the future.
Greets out also to Carol and Richard, Ben D, Phil "Destroyer" Smith and, of course, Big Jim....
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
I must keep in touch with old friends.
Tue 5th Sep 2006 @ 00:51 2006: eBay Adverts
I'm sure there must be a competition coming; however surreal and unbuyable, eBay seem to have a Google advert for it.
I googled for eds webmail, and it actually gives me the (allegedly private) URL for EDS webmail, along with about 234k other results. Natch, this doesn't give away anything too precious about EDS security, but it does raise questions about what eBay are prepared to flog.
Mon 4th Sep 2006 @ 12:26 2006: And the last shall be first
This isn't news, it's nearly a month old, but it is news to me.
At the annual DEFCON security conference, there is a Capture the Flag contest, in which teams have to secure their own server whilst retrieving "tokens" from their opponents' servers.
It was won this year by a team called l@stPlace. What strikes me as remarkable here is that they were doing it explicitly as a (mainly) Christian team. They wore very explicit T-Shirts the whole time, with "This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" written in white on a red cross on a black T-shirt. And johnny.ihacksuff.com who wrote this up is a professional hacker for CSC and not some script kiddie, after all. He, too is a Christian. He was also on an excellent edition of Moneybox yesterday (apparently a repeat from last Tuesday) about fraud (or identity theft as they insist on calling it these days).
Sun 3rd Sep 2006 @ 00:20 2006: Linux in Lazy Town
This will mean nothing to anybody who I think reads this blog, but LazyTown, a good kids TV show, promoting healthy eating and lifestyle, whilst being interesting and fun, and having a geek character (whose name I forget), had that geek character quite clearly booting a Linux system this morning.
Sun 3rd Sep 2006 @ 00:04 2006: CL1P.net
http://cl1p.net/
Post something onto cl1p.net, grab it from somewhere else. Password-protect it if you like. It could be text, or upload a file.
see also: http://cl1p.net/features.html and http://cl1p.net/more.html
Sat 2nd Sep 2006 @ 21:48 2006: Google geo data
Watch the world flicker
Google search locations by time, from one day in August 2003. Notice how tokyo doesn't sleep, whilst New York, New York, the "city that never sleeps" certainly dims at night.
Fri 1st Sep 2006 @ 20:21 2006: Bomb on a Plane
Bomb assembled on plane
According to this article:
A MAN WEARING a jacket and carrying a bag was able to sneak a bomb onto a flight from Manila to Davao City last month at the height of the nationwide security alert after Britain uncovered a plot to blow up transatlantic planes.
The man pulled off the same stunt on the return flight to Manila.
Had he detonated the bomb, he would have turned the commercial plane into a fireball and killed himself, the crew and hundreds of other passengers.
The man turned out to be a civilian antiterrorism expert tapped by a government official to test security measures at Philippine airports after British police foiled a plan to blow up US-bound planes in midair using liquid explosives.
He then assembled the bomb in the toilet.
“The only missing act was the push on the button to blow up the aircraft,” he said in an interview.
Fri 1st Sep 2006 @ 19:39 2006: Leave Them Kids Alone
Leave Them Kids Alone is a project campaigning against the increasing practice of taking school childrens' fingerprints. They have a list of schools, which includes my old secondary school, which are taking schoolchildrens' fingerprints, sometimes without parental consent.
Stockport executive member for children and young people, Councillor John Pantall, said to the Manchester Metro News: "The system can recognise the pupils' biometric details but doesn't store them in a way that can be accessed. We've had letters and information about micro librarians from the Department for Education and Schools, and on the issue of parental consent. But it is up to the schools - they take individual decisions. We've spoken out about drug testing and metal detectors in schools, but in this case I'm satisfied that a system that protects pupils' details and helps schools is in place."
DfES said that "[schools] should also inform parent[s] and get consent unless the childis of sufficient maturity hat s/he can give consent him/herself." (my emphasis). These are children, they may well be mature, but they can not be required to give their fingerprints in order to receive an education. DfES are completely out of order.
At the same time, Cambridge Uni security experts have news of even further storage of our kids' details on large, shared databases., and include the comment that "‘You can have scale, or functionality, or security.If you’re smart you can build a system with any two of these. But you can’t have all three.’"

