Email Address Password
Remember Me

Or Create a (Free) Account.
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Oct Oct
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014

Mon 8th Dec 12:08 2008: UK ISP Censorship debate

There has been some noise yesterday and today about the Wikipedia Article on the German Metal band Scorpions' 1976 album Virgin Killer. The album sleeve contains a picture of a naked prepubescent girl tied up. Wikipedia include a thumbnail of the album sleeve as part of the article, which links to a larger picture.

You would certainly not get away with publishing an album sleeve like that today, but this record is still available with this cover from some places, apparently. I do not know whose job it is to go around digging out old 1970s album sleeves and reviewing their acceptability in 2008. It does feel rather reminiscent of Spinal Tap.

I don't want to spend time getting in to the rights and wrongs of the issue; this is just to note that whilst many UK ISPs have blocked access to the entire article, using proxy servers to give a 404 "Page not found", Sky Broadband are allowing access to the article itself, but blocking access to the picture (which is of course easily available elsewhere).

Update Daniel Silverstone has a fairly clear, coherent message to ISPs on the subject of censoring the internet without the customer's explicit permission

Update Richard Clayton has a very good writeup of the event now that the censorship has been removed and all is back to normal


Comments for 'UK ISP Censorship debate'

Mon 8 Dec 2008 @ 21:57 GMT : Andy B
Apparently 'Demon' internet are ok with it...
Mon 8 Dec 2008 @ 21:59 GMT : Andy B
..or not. The article and thumbnail persist, but the picture is blocked apparently with a 403:-

"We have blocked this page because, according to the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), it contains indecent images of children or pointers to them; you could be breaking UK law if you viewed the page."
Tue 9 Dec 2008 @ 00:00 GMT : Steve Parker
403
At least an injected 403 is more honest than an injected 404, I suppose.

You could post a comment if you were logged in.

You are logged in as 0

create an account

Steve's urandom blog
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Identi.ca Share on StumbleUpon
My Shell Scripting Book:
    Shell Scripting, Expert Recipes for Linux, Bash and more
is available online and from all good booksellers:


DefectiveByDesign.org